Anatomy of a decision by the European Court of Human Rights
Rediscovering today on Internet publication da the ECHR on request Bouguerbous Case - Rediscovering since 1st release in 2010, then a second version and now a third version in 2013 recently ... it seems ... Why again this publication - who wished ... puisquelle is not interest .. it is not case law ... because it does nothing for individuals ...Why put on the net now .
By cons , we can read information - essential -
So Autopsy of the decision of the ECHR -
First, the European Court of Human Rights is one Court of Human Rights and Thanks for accepting the request ... because even if I lost this one - The European Court has had to least the merit of his work by taking the following query ... was .... very strange , I suppose malfunctions ....
I criticized the Court is that it is not the court of women's rights - the proof is not written European Court of Human Rights and the woman? is not mentioned .
When I have time I would make a petition for it to be mentioned and Surtour effective ... the title of the petition will be " equal to the ECHR - a more F " - link : http://www.change.org/fr/p%C3%A9titions/cour-europ%C3%A9enne-pour-une-%C3%A9galit%C3%A9-%C3%A0-la-cedh-un-f-en-plus
or European Court of Human Rights and Women CEDHF -
Do not worry, we know in France - Women in 1918 demanded the right to vote, they had to wait 20 years to be able to vote ... ...
Autopsy of the " body of the letter " On impartial apprence made by legal professionals , we realize that the members of the query are not all exposed equally.
- The protagonists victims - are either exposed and underexposed : the proof picture: Are we talking about me quote my name and prénon etc ... against by my sister on the dénonné O. as first O is not a civil ... besides I think any mayor would accept such a name - just as if a master call his pupil O. .. class - was not a humiliating bouffonade for a child.
- The " perpetrators " protagonists are hardly mentioned hormi - the representative of the Minister of Foreign Affairs at the time a doctor when you know that the death of my sister, is related to the medical community - It begs the question just links as a conflict of interest .. Do not do it would be sloppy research or will be silent ...
In the first photo reads: 1st sentence copied pasted :
The European Court of Human Rights ( Fifth Section), sitting on 23 March 2009 as a Chamber composed of :
Question: on the date mentioned : how the European Court could seat March 23, 2009 , while my conclusions have been challenged in August or September 2009 - see letter below the cedh dated September 11 and the letter from the Ministry case foreign ... 8 September 09 - so the court can not seat 23 March 09 because the findings had not been completed - either this is a mistake of the Court is ... the dice are loaded dice start even before reading the conclusions .... We know they exist Doctors Liars - before the National assembly in early 2013 ... for financial reasons
Strangeness in these letters are the dates .. The ECHR in response to my letter of 7 September 09 September 11 wrote to me that given the post of Foreign Affairs dated 8 September 09 - etc. ....
The editors of correspondence between the parties is ultra fast ... When we know the slowness of government is questionable .... It's still a double proof for me - when an administration wants it does things on time . Except that since February 15, 01 - has been all that slow ... Let's stop these masquerades - I know that justice will never give me my rights ... be a woman moreover with origins - is me this veto -
photo 1 - taken online September 30, 2013
A: The circumstances of the case : You can read the facts - and the protagonists it is well written it is burnt centers of Montpellier - the city is cited
But the centtre of reeducation city is not mentioned .... Why ?
photo 2 taken September 30, 2013
Law: copied pasted :
The applicant complained of a lack of thorough and effective investigation by the authorities to establish the circumstances of the death of his sister. In terms of the procedural obligation under Article 2 of the Convention , the Court considers that the French courts have not done enough to lead to the truth . She also complained of the lack of speed of the instruction. She relied on Article 2 of the Convention , which provides:
"1. The right of everyone to life shall be protected by law. Death can not be imposed on his life intentionally save in execution of a sentence of a court case where the offense is punishable by the death penalty by law. (...) "
Yes , I complained to the Court of Human Rights - a thorough and effective fault etc ... in 2009 because of the discovery of internet death cases in the drug zyprexa zyprexa and suicides in which we find no trace on the internet ' as the rest of my first petition in 2009 that mysteriously disappeared - But maybe some people Estagel 66, for example , and other cities will remember ... if the law of silence does not pass through it. ..
It is obvious that the zyprexa has side effects since the complaint 30 000 patients in the USA had to win. But I also drew attention to me - you should not have given him the medication because of weight gain - Gold on compromised by burning skin ... I do not see the point . .. with flanges ... future operations ... grandad in reconstructive and plastic ...
Because we gave the documents to the police, the prosecutor, I think that the investigation was not thorough - For the revealing sentence of the letter in green below - ( it says 22 % of his body but in reality, it was the back, arms, head , legs ... so I 'm not a doctor - but I think encryption wonder ...
( If I decided not to mention the name of the Head of clinic is not to scare patients - and I expect that justice requires to do I alert dice Association in 2001 the Minister of Health . - it was up to them to take the necessary measures to prevent another tragedy Unfortunately in 2009 a Lady of Fatima Narbonne was found dead on the tracks she was hospitalized in the same place ) .
But we knew nothing of the facts of 9 to 10 February ... which today are forcing
1 Why did not they say anything to the family as soon as the fact of 9 to 10 February. Was supposedly product ..
2 Why also if the facts are true not taking disciplinary provisions on the same day on February 10 and even have waited four days for him commissioned a taxi and sent to small family environment and we obviously took us to doctors in specialization in pyschiatrie burn - we were not equipped for pyschiques care for his burns ....
If these doctors had returned a heart patient at home everyone would have found - that the killing " was involuntary justify the failure to assist in person was justified as endangering the lives of others to know that my sister, my mother , myself , but also the inhabitants of the building is said that life hangs by a thread .... It's true - but the only call from the clinic was given the February 14 at mealtimes - Without asking us to come when my sister had the recognition disabled .. But what human beings do not become disabled or simply overwhelmed by abuse "I remember that in addition to his physical injuries, she suffered a POST TRAUMATIC STRESS - and in this context it would follow for me .... of EMDR or a lack of clear care ... means exist ... the doctors know ... especially with rafu Doctor Srevan schreiber died in June 2010 - http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Servan-Schreiber I strongly that doctors have the skills - but then there is the will to do what .... criteria ... I leave it to each his thinking ....
Photo 3 - September 30, 2013
Photo 4 to 30 September 2013
IN THE COMING WEEKS new information on this ... Case of the request ...
CHAPTER VI Official Journal 18-12-2000
Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to
effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the provisions of this article.
Everyone has the right to have his case heard fairly , openly and within
reasonable by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law. Everyone has the
possibility of being advised, defended and represented.
Legal aid is given to those who do not have sufficient resources in the
as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.
Anatomy of a decision by the European Court of Human Rights
A thought to my mother, who loved Oria, in January 2001 - she said " you cut my wings "
and she did not feel safe at the clinic -